Testing the logistic prediction of the relative judgment theory of psychological discrimination

  • Stephen Link

Abstract

The theory of comparative judgment proposed by Link (1975, 1992) received various tests and confirmations through the joint analysis of response times and response probabilities. These are strong tests of the general character of such a stochastic process. However this paper creates and applies a new approach to testing the prediction that the form of choice probabilities is logistic.

References

Fechner, G. T. (1966). Elements of psychophysics. Vol 1. (E. G. Boring and D. H. Howes, Eds. H. E. Alder, Trans.) New York; Holt Rinehart & Winston. (Original work published 1860).

Link, S. W. (1971). Applying RT deadlines to discrimination reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 25 (6), 355-358.

Link, S. W. (1975). The relative judgment theory of two choice response time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 114-135.

Link, S. W. (1978). The relative judgment theory of the psychometric function. In J. Requin (Ed.) Attention and Performance VII. (pp. 619-630). Hillsdale, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Link, S. W. (1992). The wave theory of difference and similarity. Hillsdale, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Link, S. W. (1994) Rediscovering the past: Gustav Fechner and Signal Detection Theory. Psychological Science, 5,6), 335-340.

Link, S. W. and Heath, R. A. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika. 40, 77-105.

Link, S. W. and Tindall, A. B. (1971). Speed and accuracy in comparative judgments of line length. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 3A, 284-288.

Thomas, E. A. C. and Meyers, J. L. (1971). Implications of latency data for threshold and non-threshold models of signal detection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 9, 253-285. Wald, A. (1947). Sequential analysis. New York: Wiley.

Section
Full Articles